CTOUF
Price
$12.66
Change
+$1.97 (+18.43%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.76B
SRRLF
Price
$1.34
Change
+$0.31 (+30.10%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTOUF vs SRRLF

Header iconCTOUF vs SRRLF Comparison
Open Charts CTOUF vs SRRLFBanner chart's image
Charter Hall Group
Price$12.66
Change+$1.97 (+18.43%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.76B
SIRIUS REAL ESTATE
Price$1.34
Change+$0.31 (+30.10%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization1.25B
CTOUF vs SRRLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTOUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTOUF vs. SRRLF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTOUF is a Hold and SRRLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SRRLF: $1.34)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRRLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • SRRLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTOUF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRRLF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTOUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SRRLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTOUF is a better buy in the short-term than SRRLF.

Price Growth

SRRLF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +30.58% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.33% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTOUF($10.8B) has a higher market cap than SRRLF($1.25B). SRRLF has higher P/E ratio than CTOUF: SRRLF (15.22) vs CTOUF (9.29). CTOUF YTD gains are higher at: 38.816 vs. SRRLF (14.451). CTOUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 824M vs. SRRLF (111M). CTOUF has more cash in the bank: 595M vs. SRRLF (99.2M). CTOUF has less debt than SRRLF: CTOUF (480M) vs SRRLF (1B). CTOUF has higher revenues than SRRLF: CTOUF (931M) vs SRRLF (270M).
CTOUFSRRLFCTOUF / SRRLF
Capitalization10.8B1.25B864%
EBITDA824M111M742%
Gain YTD38.81614.451269%
P/E Ratio9.2915.2261%
Revenue931M270M345%
Total Cash595M99.2M600%
Total Debt480M1B48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTOUF: Fundamental Ratings
CTOUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTOUFSRRLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTOUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDEQX72.840.85
+1.18%
Fidelity Disciplined Equity
BEMRX10.440.09
+0.87%
Brandes Emerging Markets Value R6
GQEFX35.540.21
+0.59%
GMO Quality IV
GQHPX13.210.06
+0.46%
GQG Partners US Quality Value Fund Inv
BAILX12.250.04
+0.33%
Brown Advisory Sustainable Intl Ldrs Ins

CTOUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTOUF has been loosely correlated with SURDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTOUF jumps, then SURDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTOUF
1D Price
Change %
CTOUF100%
N/A
SURDF - CTOUF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SRRLF - CTOUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAGOF - CTOUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRUNF - CTOUF
19%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
DIFTY - CTOUF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
More

SRRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRRLF has been loosely correlated with SURDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRRLF jumps, then SURDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRRLF
1D Price
Change %
SRRLF100%
N/A
SURDF - SRRLF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTOUF - SRRLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITEF - SRRLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRGTF - SRRLF
16%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
KDCCF - SRRLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More