CTRA vs SPVM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTRA is a Hold and SPVM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTRA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CTRA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTRA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CTRA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CTRA (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +1.79% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTRA is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (+0.13% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
CTRA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CTRA | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% |
CTRA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTRA has been closely correlated with RRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTRA jumps, then RRC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTRA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTRA | 100% | +2.53% | ||
| RRC - CTRA | 75% Closely correlated | +3.52% | ||
| AR - CTRA | 72% Closely correlated | +3.12% | ||
| MGY - CTRA | 71% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| MTDR - CTRA | 70% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| GPOR - CTRA | 70% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||
SPVM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPVM has been loosely correlated with BKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPVM jumps, then BKR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPVM | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| BKR - SPVM | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.03% | ||
| J - SPVM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| CTRA - SPVM | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| TPR - SPVM | 38% Loosely correlated | -5.63% | ||
| NVR - SPVM | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
More | ||||