CTS
Price
$42.95
Change
-$0.36 (-0.83%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.29B
33 days until earnings call
GLW
Price
$51.42
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
44.01B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTS vs GLW

Header iconCTS vs GLW Comparison
Open Charts CTS vs GLWBanner chart's image
CTS
Price$42.95
Change-$0.36 (-0.83%)
Volume$1.47K
Capitalization1.29B
Corning
Price$51.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$60.19K
Capitalization44.01B
CTS vs GLW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTS vs. GLW commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTS is a StrongBuy and GLW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CTS: $43.30 vs. GLW: $51.42)
Brand notoriety: CTS: Not notable vs. GLW: Notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTS: 135% vs. GLW: 100%
Market capitalization -- CTS: $1.29B vs. GLW: $44.01B
CTS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $1.29B. GLW’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $44.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $117.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GLW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLW is a better buy in the long-term than CTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GLW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTS is a better buy in the short-term than GLW.

Price Growth

CTS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +4.39% price change this week, while GLW (@Electronic Components) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

GLW is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+0.58% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLW($44B) has a higher market cap than CTS($1.29B). GLW has higher P/E ratio than CTS: GLW (98.83) vs CTS (21.80). GLW YTD gains are higher at: 9.442 vs. CTS (-17.807). GLW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.42B vs. CTS (110M). GLW has more cash in the bank: 1.36B vs. CTS (90.3M). CTS has less debt than GLW: CTS (112M) vs GLW (8.15B). GLW has higher revenues than CTS: GLW (13.6B) vs CTS (516M).
CTSGLWCTS / GLW
Capitalization1.29B44B3%
EBITDA110M2.42B5%
Gain YTD-17.8079.442-189%
P/E Ratio21.8098.8322%
Revenue516M13.6B4%
Total Cash90.3M1.36B7%
Total Debt112M8.15B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTS vs GLW: Fundamental Ratings
CTS
GLW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5675
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4418
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6022
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8211
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTS's Valuation (50) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (50). This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTS (44). This means that GLW’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's SMR Rating (100) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTS (100). This means that GLW’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Price Growth Rating (22) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTS (60). This means that GLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTS’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTS (82). This means that GLW’s stock grew significantly faster than CTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTSGLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GAHPX26.160.73
+2.87%
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq P
OSTGX16.020.27
+1.71%
Osterweis Opportunity Fund
TWCUX93.471.33
+1.44%
American Century Ultra® Inv
MWOHX62.680.79
+1.28%
MFS Global Growth R3
GLNJX21.260.24
+1.14%
MFS Global New Discovery R1

CTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTS has been closely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTS
1D Price
Change %
CTS100%
+2.68%
KN - CTS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
BHE - CTS
75%
Closely correlated
+2.66%
SANM - CTS
75%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
PLXS - CTS
74%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
TEL - CTS
74%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
More

GLW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLW has been loosely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLW jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLW
1D Price
Change %
GLW100%
-0.73%
APH - GLW
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
KN - GLW
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
TEL - GLW
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
FN - GLW
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
JBL - GLW
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
More