CTS
Price
$41.14
Change
-$0.43 (-1.03%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.23B
8 days until earnings call
GT
Price
$10.93
Change
-$0.15 (-1.35%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.9B
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTS vs GT

Header iconCTS vs GT Comparison
Open Charts CTS vs GTBanner chart's image
CTS
Price$41.14
Change-$0.43 (-1.03%)
Volume$266.8K
Capitalization1.23B
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
Price$10.93
Change-$0.15 (-1.35%)
Volume$3.85M
Capitalization3.9B
CTS vs GT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTS vs. GT commentary
Jul 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTS is a Hold and GT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CTS: $41.14 vs. GT: $10.93)
Brand notoriety: CTS: Not notable vs. GT: Notable
CTS represents the Electronic Components, while GT is part of the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTS: 158% vs. GT: 61%
Market capitalization -- CTS: $1.23B vs. GT: $3.9B
CTS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $1.23B. GT’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $120.28B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.6B. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTS is a better buy in the long-term than GT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CTS and GT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CTS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -4.83% price change this week, while GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -5.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.81%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

GT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+0.30% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.18% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GT($3.9B) has a higher market cap than CTS($1.24B). GT has higher P/E ratio than CTS: GT (769.23) vs CTS (20.88). GT YTD gains are higher at: 21.444 vs. CTS (-21.835). GT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 856M vs. CTS (110M). CTS has less debt than GT: CTS (112M) vs GT (8.65B). GT has higher revenues than CTS: GT (20.1B) vs CTS (516M).
CTSGTCTS / GT
Capitalization1.24B3.9B32%
EBITDA110M856M13%
Gain YTD-21.83521.444-102%
P/E Ratio20.88769.233%
Revenue516M20.1B3%
Total CashN/A902M-
Total Debt112M8.65B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTS vs GT: Fundamental Ratings
CTS
GT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
137
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4586
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTS's Valuation (50) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GT (50) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

CTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (86) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

CTS's SMR Rating (100) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GT (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

GT's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as CTS (61) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.

GT's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as CTS (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTSGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCUIX30.22N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps I
FTHCX91.21N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Technology C
RUNTX25.23N/A
N/A
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity M
INVNX22.83N/A
N/A
Evolutionary Tree Innovators I
ESCQX10.78-0.18
-1.64%
Embark Small Cap Equity Retirement