CTS vs SLAB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTS is a Buy and SLAB is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SLAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLAB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SLAB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CTS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +6.71% price change this week, while SLAB (@Semiconductors) price change was +13.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +4.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.75%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +8.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
SLAB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (+4.44% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
@Semiconductors (+8.65% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| CTS | SLAB | CTS / SLAB | |
| Capitalization | 1.2B | 3.34B | 36% |
| EBITDA | 106M | -104.92M | -101% |
| Gain YTD | -23.881 | -17.276 | 138% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.22 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 516M | 584M | 88% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 382M | - |
| Total Debt | 117M | 15.5M | 755% |
CTS | SLAB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CTS's Valuation (50) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SLAB (50) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to SLAB’s over the last 12 months.
CTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SLAB (83) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to SLAB’s over the last 12 months.
CTS's SMR Rating (65) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SLAB (92) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to SLAB’s over the last 12 months.
CTS's Price Growth Rating (78) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SLAB (81) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to SLAB’s over the last 12 months.
CTS's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SLAB (75) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to SLAB’s over the last 12 months.
| CTS | SLAB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 65% | 20 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 67% |
CTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTS has been closely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTS | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| KN - CTS | 78% Closely correlated | +2.81% | ||
| SANM - CTS | 74% Closely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| LFUS - CTS | 72% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| PLXS - CTS | 71% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| BHE - CTS | 71% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More | ||||