Advertisement
CTS vs TEL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CTS Corporation (CTS) vs. TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CTS Corporation (CTS) focuses on specialized sensors and components with recent strength in diversified end-markets, while TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) operates at larger scale across connectivity solutions with broader industrial and transportation exposure.
- Over the past year, TEL has delivered stronger total returns compared to CTS amid differing market positioning.
- Both companies reported solid quarterly results in early 2026, with growth driven by demand in electronics and industrial applications, though recent market activity shows varied price responses.
- CTS maintains a smaller market capitalization and niche product innovations, contrasting with TEL’s larger revenue base and emphasis on high-volume connectivity products.
- Sector exposure overlaps in automotive, industrial, and data communications, creating trade-offs in growth drivers and risk profiles tied to end-market cycles.
- Market sentiment reflects ongoing interest in electronics supply chains, with relative performance influenced by earnings execution and broader economic indicators.
Introduction
CTS Corporation (CTS) and TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) represent two players in the electronic components and connectivity sector, offering investors and traders a study in scale, specialization, and market positioning. This comparison examines their business models, recent performance trends, and relative characteristics to assist those evaluating opportunities within the industrials and technology hardware space. Portfolio managers, sector analysts, and active traders seeking balanced exposure to electronics supply chains may find the analysis relevant for assessing diversification or tactical allocation decisions in the current environment.
CTS Overview and Recent Performance
CTS Corporation (CTS) designs and manufactures engineered solutions focused on sensing, connecting, and moving applications, serving transportation, industrial, and other diversified markets. In recent market activity, the company reported first-quarter 2026 sales of $139 million, reflecting an 11% year-over-year increase, with diversified end-market sales rising 18%. Recent developments include new product introductions such as the TSX Crystal with integrated thermistor and a leadership transition with the appointment of a new CEO. Stock behavior in recent weeks has been influenced by anticipation surrounding the second-quarter earnings release scheduled for mid-July 2026, alongside broader sector sentiment tied to electronics demand.
TEL Overview and Recent Performance
TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) provides connectivity and sensor solutions across transportation, industrial, communications, and other end-markets, operating with significantly larger scale. In its fiscal second quarter of 2026, the company reported net sales of $4.74 billion, up 15% year-over-year, with adjusted earnings per share rising 24% to a record $2.73. Recent market activity included a post-earnings stock reaction amid strong order trends and AI-related revenue commentary, followed by subsequent price movements. Broader performance over recent periods reflects contributions from industrial and transportation segments, with ongoing focus on capacity and growth initiatives in data networks and related areas.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics, with only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Available bots demonstrate a range of historical win rates, return profiles, and risk parameters tailored to different trading styles. This resource allows users to explore automated approaches aligned with specific market environments. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CTS Corporation (CTS) operates with a focused portfolio of specialized components, emphasizing innovation in niche areas such as frequency control and sensors, which supports targeted growth in diversified markets. In contrast, TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) leverages greater scale and volume in connectivity products, benefiting from diversified revenue streams across multiple large segments. Recent momentum shows TEL with stronger multi-quarter sales expansion, while CTS highlights higher percentage growth in select end-markets. Risk factors differ by size, with CTS potentially more sensitive to specific customer or product cycles and TEL exposed to broader supply chain and macroeconomic variables. Both maintain sector exposure to automotive and industrial electronics, yet TEL’s larger footprint in communications and data infrastructure creates distinct positioning relative to CTS’s sensor-centric approach. Market sentiment toward each reflects execution on earnings and alignment with electronics demand trends.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency in earnings delivery, scale advantages, and positioning within growth-oriented segments, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a higher probability of favorable relative performance to TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). The company’s larger revenue base and demonstrated ability to exceed guidance in recent quarters contribute to this assessment, alongside sustained interest in its connectivity solutions. CTS Corporation (CTS) presents strengths in specialized growth areas that could support outperformance under certain conditions. This evaluation remains probabilistic and tied to ongoing market data rather than a definitive outlook.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTS is a Hold and TEL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTEL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TEL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TEL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CTS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +2.42% price change this week, while TEL (@Electronic Components) price change was -1.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
TEL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-1.31% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| CTS | TEL | CTS / TEL | |
| Capitalization | 1.72B | 58.8B | 3% |
| EBITDA | 128M | 4.73B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | 42.306 | -12.017 | -352% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.64 | 19.88 | 129% |
| Revenue | 555M | 18.7B | 3% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.11B | - |
| Total Debt | 95M | 5.66B | 2% |
CTS | TEL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TEL's Valuation (37) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTS (43). This means that TEL’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.
TEL's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTS (45). This means that TEL’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.
TEL's SMR Rating (42) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTS (64). This means that TEL’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.
CTS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TEL (59). This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to TEL’s over the last 12 months.
CTS's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for TEL (94). This means that CTS’s stock grew significantly faster than TEL’s over the last 12 months.
| CTS | TEL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 49% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EWZS | 13.62 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF | |||
| IBTJ | 21.56 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Tr ETF | |||
| SOFX | 11.13 | N/A | N/A |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SOFI ETF | |||
| LKOR | 40.24 | -0.22 | -0.54% |
| FlexShares Crdt-Scrd US Lng Corp Bd ETF | |||
| SLON | 18.57 | -1.04 | -5.31% |
| ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | |||
CTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTS has been closely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTS jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTS | 100% | +1.31% | ||
| BHE - CTS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| KN - CTS | 63% Loosely correlated | +6.01% | ||
| LFUS - CTS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| ROG - CTS | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| PLXS - CTS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||