CTSDF
Price
$4.19
Change
-$0.10 (-2.33%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
790.61M
FIS
Price
$69.90
Change
-$4.61 (-6.19%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
37.03B
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CTSDF vs FIS

Header iconCTSDF vs FIS Comparison
Open Charts CTSDF vs FISBanner chart's image
Converge Technology Solutions
Price$4.19
Change-$0.10 (-2.33%)
Volume$40.04K
Capitalization790.61M
Fidelity National Information Services
Price$69.90
Change-$4.61 (-6.19%)
Volume$8.79M
Capitalization37.03B
CTSDF vs FIS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FIS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTSDF vs. FIS commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTSDF is a Hold and FIS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CTSDF: $4.29 vs. FIS: $74.51)
Brand notoriety: CTSDF and FIS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTSDF: 251% vs. FIS: 124%
Market capitalization -- CTSDF: $790.61M vs. FIS: $37.03B
CTSDF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $790.61M. FIS’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $37.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $210.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $9.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTSDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFIS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTSDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FIS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTSDF is a better buy in the long-term than FIS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FIS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FIS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CTSDF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +12.33% price change this week, while FIS (@Information Technology Services) price change was -0.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -5.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

FIS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-5.39% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIS($37B) has a higher market cap than CTSDF($791M). CTSDF YTD gains are higher at: 87.227 vs. FIS (-7.230). FIS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.39B vs. CTSDF (-69.08M). FIS has more cash in the bank: 834M vs. CTSDF (142M). CTSDF has less debt than FIS: CTSDF (256M) vs FIS (11.5B). FIS has higher revenues than CTSDF: FIS (10.1B) vs CTSDF (2.59B).
CTSDFFISCTSDF / FIS
Capitalization791M37B2%
EBITDA-69.08M3.39B-2%
Gain YTD87.227-7.230-1,206%
P/E RatioN/A49.23-
Revenue2.59B10.1B26%
Total Cash142M834M17%
Total Debt256M11.5B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTSDF vs FIS: Fundamental Ratings
CTSDF
FIS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3222
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
9776
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9887
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FIS's Valuation (10) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as CTSDF (17) in the null industry. This means that FIS’s stock grew similarly to CTSDF’s over the last 12 months.

CTSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIS (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CTSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIS’s over the last 12 months.

FIS's SMR Rating (76) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as CTSDF (97) in the null industry. This means that FIS’s stock grew similarly to CTSDF’s over the last 12 months.

CTSDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FIS (53) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CTSDF’s stock grew similarly to FIS’s over the last 12 months.

FIS's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as CTSDF (98) in the null industry. This means that FIS’s stock grew similarly to CTSDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FIS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FIS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESS294.35-12.85
-4.18%
Essex Property Trust
PAM74.74-3.48
-4.45%
Pampa Energia SA
ARBE1.01-0.05
-4.72%
Arbe Robotics Ltd
CBL24.82-2.45
-8.98%
CBL & Associates Properties
SNSE0.33-0.04
-11.12%
Sensei Biotherapeutics

CTSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTSDF and CXGEF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTSDF and CXGEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTSDF
1D Price
Change %
CTSDF100%
+1.48%
CXGEF - CTSDF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBM - CTSDF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
EPAM - CTSDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.99%
FIS - CTSDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
GIB - CTSDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More