CTSDF
Price
$3.42
Change
+$0.05 (+1.48%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
GIB
Price
$116.29
Change
+$0.52 (+0.45%)
Updated
Oct 18, 11:12 AM (EDT)
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CTSDF vs GIB

Header iconCTSDF vs GIB Comparison
Open Charts CTSDF vs GIBBanner chart's image
Converge Technology Solutions
Price$3.42
Change+$0.05 (+1.48%)
Volume$8.15K
CapitalizationN/A
CGI
Price$116.29
Change+$0.52 (+0.45%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CTSDF vs GIB Comparison Chart
Loading...
GIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CTSDF vs. GIB commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTSDF is a Sell and GIB is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CTSDF: $3.42 vs. GIB: $115.77)
Brand notoriety: CTSDF and GIB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTSDF: 193% vs. GIB: 67%
Market capitalization -- CTSDF: $637.3M vs. GIB: $26.22B
CTSDF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $637.3M. GIB’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $26.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $221.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTSDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGIB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTSDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GIB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GIB is a better buy in the long-term than CTSDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GIB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GIB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CTSDF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +3.32% price change this week, while GIB (@Information Technology Services) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

GIB is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+0.90% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GIB($26.2B) has a higher market cap than CTSDF($637M). CTSDF YTD gains are higher at: 9.335 vs. GIB (7.984). GIB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.89B vs. CTSDF (-27.23M). GIB has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. CTSDF (174M). CTSDF has less debt than GIB: CTSDF (332M) vs GIB (3.05B). GIB has higher revenues than CTSDF: GIB (14.5B) vs CTSDF (2.64B).
CTSDFGIBCTSDF / GIB
Capitalization637M26.2B2%
EBITDA-27.23M2.89B-1%
Gain YTD9.3357.984117%
P/E RatioN/A21.75-
Revenue2.64B14.5B18%
Total Cash174M1.16B15%
Total Debt332M3.05B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GIB: Fundamental Ratings
GIB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GIB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

CTSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTSDF and FIS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTSDF and FIS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTSDF
1D Price
Change %
CTSDF100%
-0.87%
FIS - CTSDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
EPAM - CTSDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
GIB - CTSDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
GLOB - CTSDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
CDW - CTSDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
More

GIB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GIB has been loosely correlated with ACN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GIB jumps, then ACN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GIB
1D Price
Change %
GIB100%
+0.92%
ACN - GIB
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
AI - GIB
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
FLYW - GIB
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
CTSH - GIB
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
PSFE - GIB
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
More