It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTSDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIPSI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTSDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IPSI’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
CTSDF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -2.45% price change this week, while IPSI (@Information Technology Services) price change was -13.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.09%.
IPSI is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
CTSDF | IPSI | CTSDF / IPSI | |
Capitalization | 464M | 5.65M | 8,207% |
EBITDA | -42.01M | -8.27M | 508% |
Gain YTD | -24.092 | -73.536 | 33% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.56B | 1.28K | 200,156,250% |
Total Cash | 180M | 156K | 115,385% |
Total Debt | 308M | 3.78M | 8,140% |
IPSI | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 38 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CTSDF | IPSI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago84% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago78% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 3 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago80% | 6 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CTSDF and CXGEF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTSDF and CXGEF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTSDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CTSDF | 100% | -0.90% | ||
CXGEF - CTSDF | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IBM - CTSDF | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
EPAM - CTSDF | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.87% | ||
FIS - CTSDF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
GIB - CTSDF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPSI and CTSDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPSI and CTSDF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPSI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IPSI | 100% | +0.01% | ||
CTSDF - IPSI | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
SUIC - IPSI | 14% Poorly correlated | -10.28% | ||
APXYY - IPSI | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
NURAF - IPSI | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
DTTLY - IPSI | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |