CUB
Price
$10.46
Change
-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.38B
GD
Price
$294.48
Change
+$0.56 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
79.11B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUB vs GD

Header iconCUB vs GD Comparison
Open Charts CUB vs GDBanner chart's image
Lionheart Holdings
Price$10.46
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization2.38B
General Dynamics
Price$294.48
Change+$0.56 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization79.11B
CUB vs GD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUB vs. GD commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUB is a StrongBuy and GD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GD: $294.76)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • GD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GD is a better buy in the short-term than CUB.

Price Growth

GD (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +1.68% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

GD is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+1.15% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GD($79.1B) has a higher market cap than CUB($2.38B). CUB has higher P/E ratio than GD: CUB (334.97) vs GD (20.46). GD YTD gains are higher at: 13.666 vs. CUB (3.564). GD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.06B vs. CUB (202M). CUB has less debt than GD: CUB (1.01B) vs GD (11.5B). GD has higher revenues than CUB: GD (49.2B) vs CUB (1.49B).
CUBGDCUB / GD
Capitalization2.38B79.1B3%
EBITDA202M6.06B3%
Gain YTD3.56413.66626%
P/E Ratio334.9720.461,638%
Revenue1.49B49.2B3%
Total Cash171MN/A-
Total Debt1.01B11.5B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUB vs GD: Fundamental Ratings
CUB
GD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8822
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
1649
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1270
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GD's Valuation (18) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is significantly better than the same rating for CUB (100). This means that GD’s stock grew significantly faster than CUB’s over the last 12 months.

GD's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is significantly better than the same rating for CUB (100). This means that GD’s stock grew significantly faster than CUB’s over the last 12 months.

CUB's SMR Rating (16) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GD (49). This means that CUB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GD’s over the last 12 months.

GD's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as CUB (56). This means that GD’s stock grew similarly to CUB’s over the last 12 months.

CUB's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GD (70). This means that CUB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUBGD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSCV37.020.32
+0.87%
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF
DUKX24.100.06
+0.26%
Ocean Park International ETF
SRLN41.460.06
+0.14%
SPDR® Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
RMIF24.950.02
+0.08%
LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF
PABD60.29-0.12
-0.20%
iSharesParis-AlgndClmOptdMSCIWldexUSAETF

CUB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUB and BA have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUB and BA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUB
1D Price
Change %
CUB100%
-0.24%
BA - CUB
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
LMT - CUB
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
GE - CUB
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
RTX - CUB
-5%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
GD - CUB
-6%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%