It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CUB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRTLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CUB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CUB (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.19% price change this week, while TRTLF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +73.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +77.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +156.19%.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
CUB | TRTLF | CUB / TRTLF | |
Capitalization | 321M | 267M | 120% |
EBITDA | N/A | 5.99M | - |
Gain YTD | 3.762 | 0.000 | - |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 61.44 | - |
Revenue | N/A | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 698K | 149K | 468% |
Total Debt | N/A | 3.13M | - |
CUB | TRTLF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 36 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TRTLF's Valuation (82) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as CUB (100) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that TRTLF’s stock grew similarly to CUB’s over the last 12 months.
TRTLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as CUB (100) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that TRTLF’s stock grew similarly to CUB’s over the last 12 months.
CUB's SMR Rating (16) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRTLF (86) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that CUB’s stock grew significantly faster than TRTLF’s over the last 12 months.
CUB's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as TRTLF (57) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that CUB’s stock grew similarly to TRTLF’s over the last 12 months.
CUB's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as TRTLF (13) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that CUB’s stock grew similarly to TRTLF’s over the last 12 months.
CUB | TRTLF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago30% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago38% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago24% | 1 day ago7% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago40% | 1 day ago8% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago53% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago45% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago4% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUB has been loosely correlated with GRAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUB jumps, then GRAF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CUB | 100% | N/A | ||
GRAF - CUB | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
TRTLF - CUB | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TACO - CUB | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
CAPN - CUB | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
BA - CUB | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TRTLF and AACI have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRTLF and AACI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRTLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TRTLF | 100% | N/A | ||
AACI - TRTLF | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.69% | ||
PEGR - TRTLF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
VMCAF - TRTLF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PLMIU - TRTLF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IRRX - TRTLF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |