CULTF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
6.11M
GFCOF
Price
$0.35
Change
+$0.03 (+9.38%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
14.76M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CULTF vs GFCOF

Header iconCULTF vs GFCOF Comparison
Open Charts CULTF vs GFCOFBanner chart's image
Cult Food Science
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$164.88K
Capitalization6.11M
Good Flour
Price$0.35
Change+$0.03 (+9.38%)
Volume$4.62K
Capitalization14.76M
CULTF vs GFCOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CULTF vs. GFCOF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CULTF is a Hold and GFCOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (CULTF: $0.02 vs. GFCOF: $0.35)
Brand notoriety: CULTF and GFCOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CULTF: 152% vs. GFCOF: 69%
Market capitalization -- CULTF: $6.11M vs. GFCOF: $14.76M
CULTF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $6.11M. GFCOF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $14.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CULTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGFCOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CULTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GFCOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFCOF is a better buy in the long-term than CULTF.

Price Growth

CULTF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while GFCOF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +10.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.44%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+10.42% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFCOF($14.8M) has a higher market cap than CULTF($6.11M). GFCOF YTD gains are higher at: 505.081 vs. CULTF (-52.412). CULTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.44M vs. GFCOF (-4.9M). CULTF has more cash in the bank: 940K vs. GFCOF (376K). CULTF has less debt than GFCOF: CULTF (47.7K) vs GFCOF (534K). GFCOF has higher revenues than CULTF: GFCOF (1.08M) vs CULTF (0).
CULTFGFCOFCULTF / GFCOF
Capitalization6.11M14.8M41%
EBITDA-4.44M-4.9M91%
Gain YTD-52.412505.081-10%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue01.08M-
Total Cash940K376K250%
Total Debt47.7K534K9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFCOF: Fundamental Ratings
GFCOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIVIX67.63-0.55
-0.81%
Vanguard Value Index I
JDWNX117.16-1.53
-1.29%
Janus Henderson Global Research N
MGLBX29.10-0.43
-1.46%
Marsico Global
SIGWX6.76-0.13
-1.89%
Touchstone Small Company Y
SBFAX28.68-0.56
-1.92%
1919 Financial Services A

CULTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CULTF and TATYY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CULTF and TATYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CULTF
1D Price
Change %
CULTF100%
N/A
TATYY - CULTF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
GWLL - CULTF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNDDF - CULTF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOOOF - CULTF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFCOF - CULTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GFCOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GFCOF and MNDDF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFCOF and MNDDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFCOF
1D Price
Change %
GFCOF100%
N/A
MNDDF - GFCOF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CULTF - GFCOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLL - GFCOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOOOF - GFCOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRCC - GFCOF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.83%
More