Ad is loading...
CUT vs HAP
CUT vs HAP Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs HAP
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$29.95
Change+$0.28 (+0.94%)
Volume$225
Net Assets45.1M
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Price$48.68
Change+$0.68 (+1.42%)
Volume$1.9K
Net Assets146.77M
CUT vs HAP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. HAP commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Buy and HAP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAP has more net assets: 147M vs. CUT (45.1M). HAP has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: HAP (5.272) vs CUT (-6.292). CUT was incepted earlier than HAP: CUT (17 years) vs HAP (17 years). HAP (0.43) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.67). CUT has a higher turnover HAP (26.00) vs HAP (26.00).
| CUT | HAP | CUT / HAP | |
| Gain YTD | -6.292 | 5.272 | -119% |
| Net Assets | 45.1M | 147M | 31% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.43 | 156% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 26.00 | 123% |
| Yield | 3.15 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HAP | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 41% Loosely correlated | +3.49% | ||
| BILL - CUT | 34% Loosely correlated | +4.24% | ||
More | ||||
HAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAP has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAP jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAP | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| SHEL - HAP | 78% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| TECK - HAP | 77% Closely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| RIO - HAP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| WDS - HAP | 76% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| E - HAP | 75% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
More | ||||