Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs MOO
CUT vs MOO Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs MOO
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$27.65
Change-$0.08 (-0.29%)
Volume$620
Net Assets36.03M
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Price$70.20
Change-$0.63 (-0.89%)
Volume$105
Net Assets580.66M
CUT vs MOO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. MOO commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and MOO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOO has more net assets: 581M vs. CUT (36M). MOO has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: MOO (9.780) vs CUT (-12.425). CUT was incepted earlier than MOO: CUT (18 years) vs MOO (18 years). MOO (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover MOO (12.00) vs MOO (12.00).
| CUT | MOO | CUT / MOO | |
| Gain YTD | -12.425 | 9.780 | -127% |
| Net Assets | 36M | 581M | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.55 | 135% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 12.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 3.44 | 3.08 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been closely correlated with CNH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then CNH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| CNH - MOO | 67% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| DE - MOO | 67% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| CTVA - MOO | 67% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| MOS - MOO | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| AGCO - MOO | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||