Ad is loading...
CUT vs MOO
CUT vs MOO Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs MOO
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$28.94
Change+$1.66 (+6.09%)
Volume$200
Net Assets42.44M
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Price$64.35
Change+$4.14 (+6.88%)
Volume$500
Net Assets506.09M
CUT vs MOO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. MOO commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and MOO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOO has more net assets: 506M vs. CUT (42.4M). MOO has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: MOO (-6.680) vs CUT (-13.850). CUT was incepted earlier than MOO: CUT (17 years) vs MOO (18 years). MOO (0.53) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.67). CUT has a higher turnover MOO (12.00) vs MOO (12.00).
| CUT | MOO | CUT / MOO | |
| Gain YTD | -13.850 | -6.680 | 207% |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 506M | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.53 | 126% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 12.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 3.15 | 3.24 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MOO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -2.47% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.92% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.93% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 37% Loosely correlated | -7.63% | ||
| BILL - CUT | 29% Poorly correlated | -5.59% | ||
More | ||||
MOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been closely correlated with CTVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then CTVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y