CUT | NIKL | CUT / NIKL | |
Gain YTD | -8.027 | -23.454 | 34% |
Net Assets | 44.2M | 10.2M | 433% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
Turnover | 32.00 | 55.00 | 58% |
Yield | 3.15 | 4.15 | 76% |
Fund Existence | 17 years | 2 years | - |
RSI ODDS (%) |
Stochastic ODDS (%) |
Momentum ODDS (%) |
MACD ODDS (%) |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
Advances ODDS (%) |
Declines ODDS (%) |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
Aroon ODDS (%) |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CUT | 100% | +1.93% | ||
AMCR - CUT | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.44% | ||
SLVM - CUT | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
WFG - CUT | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
PACK - CUT | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
BILL - CUT | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIKL has been loosely correlated with LZM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NIKL jumps, then LZM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIKL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NIKL | 100% | +4.11% | ||
LZM - NIKL | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
NICE - NIKL | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.40% | ||
NIC - NIKL | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
S - NIKL | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
RDN - NIKL | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.69% | ||
More |