It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CVLT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVLT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LKCO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CVLT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.86% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.05%.
CVLT is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
CVLT | LKCO | CVLT / LKCO | |
Capitalization | 4.38B | 10.9M | 40,193% |
EBITDA | 29.8M | -68.23M | -44% |
Gain YTD | 108.441 | -62.913 | -172% |
P/E Ratio | 181.82 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 819M | 170M | 482% |
Total Cash | 284M | 1.01M | 28,147% |
Total Debt | 13.1M | 3.54M | 370% |
CVLT | LKCO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LKCO's Valuation (51) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVLT (84). This means that LKCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVLT’s over the last 12 months.
CVLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for LKCO (100). This means that CVLT’s stock grew significantly faster than LKCO’s over the last 12 months.
CVLT's SMR Rating (14) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for LKCO (97). This means that CVLT’s stock grew significantly faster than LKCO’s over the last 12 months.
CVLT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKCO (93). This means that CVLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKCO’s over the last 12 months.
CVLT's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for LKCO (100). This means that CVLT’s stock grew significantly faster than LKCO’s over the last 12 months.
CVLT | LKCO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago70% | 9 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago57% | 1 day ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVLT has been loosely correlated with FFIV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVLT jumps, then FFIV could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVLT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CVLT | 100% | -2.58% | ||
FFIV - CVLT | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
VRNS - CVLT | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
CDNS - CVLT | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
TENB - CVLT | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
COIN - CVLT | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LKCO has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LKCO jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LKCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LKCO | 100% | -8.72% | ||
COIN - LKCO | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
CVLT - LKCO | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.58% | ||
LPSN - LKCO | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.56% | ||
RIOT - LKCO | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
AVDX - LKCO | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
More |