Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVTRX vs FCSDX
CVTRX vs FCSDX Comparison
Open Charts CVTRX vs FCSDX
Calamos Growth & Income A
Price$51.59
Change+$0.30 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.96B
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.25
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
CVTRX vs FCSDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVTRX vs. FCSDX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVTRX is a Buy and FCSDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. CVTRX (2.96B). FCSDX pays higher dividends than CVTRX: FCSDX (1.47) vs CVTRX (0.67). CVTRX was incepted earlier than FCSDX: CVTRX (37 years) vs FCSDX (22 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CVTRX (1.05). FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CVTRX (28.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVTRX: FCSDX (0) vs CVTRX (2500). CVTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.26 vs. FCSDX (6.33). CVTRX return over 5 years is better than : 58.05 vs. FCSDX (32.78).
| CVTRX | FCSDX | CVTRX / FCSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.100 | 3.733 | 163% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.96B | 5.13B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.47 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.26 | 6.33 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.88 | 17.09 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.05 | 32.78 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.80 | 35.53 | 241% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement