Ad is loading...
CWGCX vs LGCAX ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
CWGCX vs LGCAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs LGCAX
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs LGCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CWGCX vs. LGCAX commentary
Nov 28, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and LGCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LGCAX (15.5M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than LGCAX: CWGCX (1.27) vs LGCAX (0.63). CWGCX was incepted earlier than LGCAX: CWGCX (23 years) vs LGCAX (7 years). LGCAX (3.43) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.52). LGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CWGCX (32.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGCAX: CWGCX (250) vs LGCAX (1500). LGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.69 vs. CWGCX (11.53). LGCAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.39 vs. CWGCX (25.33).
| CWGCX | LGCAX | CWGCX / LGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.90 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 3.43 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.440 | 17.197 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 15.5M | 722,581% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.63 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 13.69 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.30 | -3.17 | -136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.33 | 31.39 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers