Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MSFBX
CWGCX vs MSFBX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MSFBX
CWGCX vs MSFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MSFBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and MSFBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MSFBX (851M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than MSFBX: CWGCX (0.71) vs MSFBX (0.18). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MSFBX: CWGCX (26 years) vs MSFBX (25 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MSFBX (1.21). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSFBX (35.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFBX: CWGCX (250) vs MSFBX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.62 vs. MSFBX (-21.70). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.85 vs. MSFBX (-21.29).
| CWGCX | MSFBX | CWGCX / MSFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.21 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.21 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | -6.799 | -227% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 851M | 18,566% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.18 | 392% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | -21.70 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | -15.96 | -302% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | -21.29 | -136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | 31.62 | 287% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement