Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs RGLGX
CWGCX vs RGLGX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs RGLGX
CWGCX vs RGLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. RGLGX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and RGLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLGX (21.5B). RGLGX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: RGLGX (1.08) vs CWGCX (0.75). CWGCX was incepted earlier than RGLGX: CWGCX (25 years) vs RGLGX (7 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGLGX (0.45). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLGX (35.00). CWGCX (250) and RGLGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.89 vs. CWGCX (20.66). RGLGX return over 5 years is better than : 55.52 vs. CWGCX (31.37).
| CWGCX | RGLGX | CWGCX / RGLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.45 | 329% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.45 | 329% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.627 | 9.972 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.08 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.66 | 22.89 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.02 | 57.75 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.37 | 55.52 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement