Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs MVGBX
CWGFX vs MVGBX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs MVGBX
CWGFX vs MVGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. MVGBX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and MVGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. MVGBX (294M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than MVGBX: CWGFX (1.30) vs MVGBX (0.57). CWGFX was incepted earlier than MVGBX: CWGFX (25 years) vs MVGBX (13 years). MVGBX (1.77) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MVGBX (31.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVGBX: CWGFX (250) vs MVGBX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.43 vs. MVGBX (-0.23). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.31 vs. MVGBX (11.70).
| CWGFX | MVGBX | CWGFX / MVGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.74 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.77 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.636 | 2.755 | 568% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 294M | 51,701% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.57 | 228% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | -0.23 | -9,755% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.53 | 20.65 | 264% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.31 | 11.70 | 302% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.29 | 61.16 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers