Ad is loading...
CWI vs DBEF
CWI vs DBEF Comparison
Open Charts CWI vs DBEF
SPDR® MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
Price$30.91
Change+$0.60 (+1.98%)
Volume$13.53K
Net Assets1.76B
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
Price$43.77
Change+$0.63 (+1.46%)
Volume$1.25K
Net Assets7.73B
CWI vs DBEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWI vs. DBEF commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWI is a Buy and DBEF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBEF has more net assets: 7.73B vs. CWI (1.76B). CWI has a higher annual dividend yield than DBEF: CWI (8.482) vs DBEF (4.203). CWI was incepted earlier than DBEF: CWI (18 years) vs DBEF (14 years). CWI (0.30) has a lower expense ratio than DBEF (0.35). DBEF has a higher turnover CWI (4.00) vs CWI (4.00).
| CWI | DBEF | CWI / DBEF | |
| Gain YTD | 8.482 | 4.203 | 202% |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 7.73B | 23% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.35 | 86% |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 11.00 | 36% |
| Yield | 2.66 | 1.24 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWI | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 76% | 25 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CWI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWI has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWI jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
DBEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBEF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DBEF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DBEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBEF | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| STM - DBEF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| BN - DBEF | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| ACA - DBEF | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| ASML - DBEF | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| SHEL - DBEF | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||