CWT vs GH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWT is a Hold and GH is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CWT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CWT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CWT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CWT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CWT (@Water Utilities) experienced а -3.43% price change this week, while GH (@Medical Specialties) price change was -5.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Water Utilities industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.66%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
CWT is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
GH is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Water Utilities (-1.20% weekly)Water utilities operate water treatment plants, and/or distribute water to residential and commercial customers. Companies operating in this industry are largely responsible for the safe and timely distribution of water. While most water systems are local or regional, some of the companies might have operations across several states. The industry is expected to be closely monitored by regulators for quality checks on the water being distributed. Investing in upgrading infrastructure is a major factor in bolstering the supply of clean/safe-to-use water. Given the absolute necessity of water in our lives, the industry is largely non-cyclical. American Water Works Company, Inc., Aqua America, Inc., American States Water Co. and California Water Service Group are some of the major water utilities companies in the U.S.
@Medical Specialties (+0.94% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| CWT | GH | CWT / GH | |
| Capitalization | 2.68B | 2.47B | 109% |
| EBITDA | 218M | -433.3M | -50% |
| Gain YTD | 8.074 | 36.563 | 22% |
| P/E Ratio | 51.13 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 795M | 564M | 141% |
| Total Cash | 39.6M | 1.17B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 1.23B | 1.35B | 91% |
CWT | GH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 74 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GH's Valuation (67) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as CWT (78) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that GH’s stock grew similarly to CWT’s over the last 12 months.
CWT's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the Water Utilities industry is in the same range as GH (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that CWT’s stock grew similarly to GH’s over the last 12 months.
CWT's SMR Rating (74) in the Water Utilities industry is in the same range as GH (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that CWT’s stock grew similarly to GH’s over the last 12 months.
GH's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as CWT (52) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that GH’s stock grew similarly to CWT’s over the last 12 months.
CWT's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Water Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GH (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that CWT’s stock grew somewhat faster than GH’s over the last 12 months.
| CWT | GH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 55% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 84% |
CWT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWT has been closely correlated with AWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWT jumps, then AWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWT | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| AWR - CWT | 87% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| HTO - CWT | 81% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| WTRG - CWT | 77% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| YORW - CWT | 73% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| AWK - CWT | 70% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
More | ||||
GH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GH has been loosely correlated with VCYT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GH jumps, then VCYT could also see price increases.