CWT vs LPG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWT is a Buy and LPG is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CWT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLPG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CWT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LPG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CWT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LPG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CWT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LPG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CWT (@Water Utilities) experienced а -1.65% price change this week, while LPG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Water Utilities industry was -0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.52%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
CWT is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
LPG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Water Utilities (-0.07% weekly)Water utilities operate water treatment plants, and/or distribute water to residential and commercial customers. Companies operating in this industry are largely responsible for the safe and timely distribution of water. While most water systems are local or regional, some of the companies might have operations across several states. The industry is expected to be closely monitored by regulators for quality checks on the water being distributed. Investing in upgrading infrastructure is a major factor in bolstering the supply of clean/safe-to-use water. Given the absolute necessity of water in our lives, the industry is largely non-cyclical. American Water Works Company, Inc., Aqua America, Inc., American States Water Co. and California Water Service Group are some of the major water utilities companies in the U.S.
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.35% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| CWT | LPG | CWT / LPG | |
| Capitalization | 2.68B | 1.66B | 162% |
| EBITDA | 218M | 428M | 51% |
| Gain YTD | 11.275 | -11.430 | -99% |
| P/E Ratio | 51.13 | 5.42 | 943% |
| Revenue | 795M | 553M | 144% |
| Total Cash | 39.6M | 208M | 19% |
| Total Debt | 1.23B | 818M | 151% |
CWT | LPG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LPG's Valuation (3) in the Marine Shipping industry is significantly better than the same rating for CWT (76) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that LPG’s stock grew significantly faster than CWT’s over the last 12 months.
LPG's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CWT (87) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that LPG’s stock grew similarly to CWT’s over the last 12 months.
LPG's SMR Rating (54) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as CWT (61) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that LPG’s stock grew similarly to CWT’s over the last 12 months.
CWT's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Water Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPG (83) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that CWT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPG’s over the last 12 months.
LPG's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWT (98) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that LPG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWT’s over the last 12 months.
| CWT | LPG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 80% |
CWT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWT has been closely correlated with AWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWT jumps, then AWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWT | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| AWR - CWT | 87% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| SJW - CWT | 81% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| WTRG - CWT | 76% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| YORW - CWT | 74% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| AWK - CWT | 70% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||