Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CXGCX vs MCOAX
CXGCX vs MCOAX Comparison
Open Charts CXGCX vs MCOAX
Calamos Global Convertible I
Price$13.31
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.58M
NYLI MacKay Convertible
Price$19.66
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
CXGCX vs MCOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CXGCX vs. MCOAX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXGCX is a Hold and MCOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCOAX has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. CXGCX (143M). MCOAX pays higher dividends than CXGCX: MCOAX (3.07) vs CXGCX (0.00). CXGCX was incepted earlier than MCOAX: CXGCX (11 years) vs MCOAX (31 years). CXGCX (1.10) is less costly to investors than MCOAX (0.94). CXGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. MCOAX (35.00). MCOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CXGCX: MCOAX (15000) vs CXGCX (1000000). CXGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.49 vs. MCOAX (9.05). MCOAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.01 vs. CXGCX (9.94).
| CXGCX | MCOAX | CXGCX / MCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.94 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.94 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.873 | 5.764 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 15000 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25000 | - |
| Net Assets | 143M | 1.55B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 3.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.49 | 9.05 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.31 | 22.09 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.94 | 14.01 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.54 | 33.80 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement