Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CXHYX vs GGLPX
CXHYX vs GGLPX Comparison
Open Charts CXHYX vs GGLPX
Macquarie National Hi-Yld Muni Bd A
Price$9.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.19B
Goldman Sachs High Yield Muni P
Price$8.77
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.63B
CXHYX vs GGLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CXHYX vs. GGLPX commentary
Aug 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXHYX is a Hold and GGLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGLPX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. CXHYX (3.19B). CXHYX (4.92) and GGLPX (4.73) have matching dividends . CXHYX was incepted earlier than GGLPX: CXHYX (39 years) vs GGLPX (7 years). CXHYX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GGLPX (0.55). CXHYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. GGLPX (18.00). GGLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CXHYX: GGLPX (0) vs CXHYX (1000). GGLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.07 vs. CXHYX (-4.64). GGLPX return over 5 years is better than : 4.48 vs. CXHYX (-0.83).
| CXHYX | GGLPX | CXHYX / GGLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.52 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.55 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.315 | -2.711 | 159% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.19B | 11.6B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.92 | 4.73 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.64 | -2.07 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.26 | 7.18 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.83 | 4.48 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement