Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CXHYX vs GGLPX
CXHYX vs GGLPX Comparison
Open Charts CXHYX vs GGLPX
Macquarie National Hi-Yld Muni Bd A
Price$9.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.4B
Goldman Sachs High Yield Muni P
Price$8.88
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.58B
CXHYX vs GGLPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CXHYX vs. GGLPX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXHYX is a Hold and GGLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGLPX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. CXHYX (3.4B). CXHYX (4.79) and GGLPX (4.61) have matching dividends . CXHYX was incepted earlier than GGLPX: CXHYX (39 years) vs GGLPX (7 years). CXHYX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GGLPX (0.55). GGLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CXHYX (19.00). GGLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CXHYX: GGLPX (0) vs CXHYX (1000). GGLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.13 vs. CXHYX (-0.87). GGLPX return over 5 years is better than : 9.81 vs. CXHYX (4.51).
| CXHYX | GGLPX | CXHYX / GGLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.53 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.55 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.203 | -2.170 | 148% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.4B | 11.6B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.79 | 4.61 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.87 | 1.13 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.99 | 7.00 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.51 | 9.81 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement