Ad is loading...
CXHYX vs PRFHX
CXHYX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts CXHYX vs PRFHX
Macquarie National Hi-Yld Muni Bd A
Price$9.71
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.47B
T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield
Price$10.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.35B
CXHYX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CXHYX vs. PRFHX commentary
Apr 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXHYX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXHYX (3.47B) and PRFHX (3.35B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CXHYX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: CXHYX (4.67) vs PRFHX (3.88). CXHYX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: CXHYX (39 years) vs PRFHX (40 years). CXHYX (0.87) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.63). CXHYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. PRFHX (11.60). CXHYX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRFHX: CXHYX (1000) vs PRFHX (2500). PRFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.19 vs. CXHYX (1.15). PRFHX return over 5 years is better than : 9.98 vs. CXHYX (7.53).
| CXHYX | PRFHX | CXHYX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.63 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.63 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.371 | -2.863 | 118% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.47B | 3.35B | 104% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.67 | 3.88 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.15 | 2.19 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.21 | 3.91 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.53 | 9.98 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.62 | 15.09 | 137% |