Ad is loading...
CXHYX vs PRFHX
CXHYX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts CXHYX vs PRFHX
Macquarie National Hi-Yld Muni Bd A
Price$9.73
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.5B
T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield
Price$10.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.31B
CXHYX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CXHYX vs. PRFHX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXHYX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXHYX has more cash in the bank: 3.5B vs. PRFHX (3.31B). CXHYX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: CXHYX (4.76) vs PRFHX (3.97). CXHYX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: CXHYX (39 years) vs PRFHX (40 years). CXHYX (0.87) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.63). CXHYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. PRFHX (14.20). CXHYX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRFHX: CXHYX (1000) vs PRFHX (2500). PRFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.94 vs. CXHYX (0.35). PRFHX return over 5 years is better than : 12.67 vs. CXHYX (10.62).
| CXHYX | PRFHX | CXHYX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.63 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.63 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.598 | -1.804 | 144% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.5B | 3.31B | 106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.76 | 3.97 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | 1.94 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.58 | 9.10 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.62 | 12.67 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.28 | 18.00 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...