Ad is loading...
CXHYX vs PYMAX
CXHYX vs PYMAX Comparison
Open Charts CXHYX vs PYMAX
Macquarie National Hi-Yld Muni Bd A
Price$9.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.47B
PIMCO High Yield Municipal Bond A
Price$8.23
Change+$0.02 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.55B
CXHYX vs PYMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CXHYX vs. PYMAX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXHYX is a Hold and PYMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PYMAX has more cash in the bank: 5.55B vs. CXHYX (3.47B). CXHYX pays higher dividends than PYMAX: CXHYX (4.67) vs PYMAX (4.21). CXHYX was incepted earlier than PYMAX: CXHYX (39 years) vs PYMAX (19 years). CXHYX (0.87) and PYMAX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . PYMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CXHYX (19.00). CXHYX initial investment is less costly to investors than PYMAX (2%) vs PYMAX (2%). CXHYX (1000) and PYMAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PYMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.63 vs. CXHYX (1.24). CXHYX return over 5 years is better than : 9.52 vs. PYMAX (8.61).
| CXHYX | PYMAX | CXHYX / PYMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.86 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.86 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.471 | -1.880 | 185% |
| Front Load | 5% | 2% | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.47B | 5.55B | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.67 | 4.21 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.24 | 2.63 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.90 | 4.11 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.52 | 8.61 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.94 | 29.20 | 72% |