CXT vs EPAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXT is a StrongSell and EPAC is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CXT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEPAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CXT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EPAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CXT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPAC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CXT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- EPAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CXT (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -2.10% price change this week, while EPAC (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -6.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
CXT is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.
EPAC is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-0.80% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| CXT | EPAC | CXT / EPAC | |
| Capitalization | 3.52B | 1.93B | 183% |
| EBITDA | 368M | 128M | 288% |
| Gain YTD | -1.640 | 53.119 | -3% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.60 | 26.10 | 71% |
| Revenue | 1.39B | 597M | 233% |
| Total Cash | 227M | 154M | 147% |
| Total Debt | 695M | 245M | 284% |
CXT | EPAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CXT's Valuation (51) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as EPAC (78) in the null industry. This means that CXT’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
EPAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CXT (100) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew significantly faster than CXT’s over the last 12 months.
EPAC's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CXT (48) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew similarly to CXT’s over the last 12 months.
EPAC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CXT (57) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew similarly to CXT’s over the last 12 months.
CXT's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAC (58) in the null industry. This means that CXT’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
| CXT | EPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 62% | 7 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 60% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PDRDX | 11.45 | 0.02 | +0.17% |
| Principal Diversified Real Asset Instl | |||
| VLAAX | 45.91 | -0.43 | -0.93% |
| Value Line Asset Allocation Investor | |||
| WAEMX | 2.99 | -0.03 | -0.99% |
| Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Inv | |||
| MEYWX | 12.89 | -0.24 | -1.83% |
| Manning & Napier Equity Series W | |||
| APGAX | 101.16 | -2.75 | -2.65% |
| AB Large Cap Growth A | |||
CXT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXT has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXT jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CXT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXT | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| CR - CXT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| FLS - CXT | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| HI - CXT | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| ENOV - CXT | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| EPAC - CXT | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
More | ||||
EPAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAC has been loosely correlated with FSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPAC jumps, then FSS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAC | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| FSS - EPAC | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| NPO - EPAC | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| FELE - EPAC | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| KMT - EPAC | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| FLS - EPAC | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||