CYBCF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
SHLT
Price
$3.02
Change
-$0.48 (-13.71%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

CYBCF vs SHLT

Header iconCYBCF vs SHLT Comparison
Open Charts CYBCF vs SHLTBanner chart's image
Cybeats Technologies
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$14.89K
CapitalizationN/A
SHL Telemedicine
Price$3.02
Change-$0.48 (-13.71%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
CYBCF vs SHLT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CYBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYBCF vs. SHLT commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYBCF is a Hold and SHLT is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CYBCF: $0.09 vs. SHLT: $3.50)
Brand notoriety: CYBCF and SHLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYBCF: 57% vs. SHLT: 410%
Market capitalization -- CYBCF: $39.28M vs. SHLT: $99.02M
CYBCF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $39.28M. SHLT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $99.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYBCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHLT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CYBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHLT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CYBCF and SHLT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYBCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHLT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYBCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SHLT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHLT is a better buy in the short-term than CYBCF.

Price Growth

CYBCF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -7.56% price change this week, while SHLT (@Packaged Software) price change was +30.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHLT is expected to report earnings on Nov 29, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHLT($99M) has a higher market cap than CYBCF($39.3M). CYBCF YTD gains are higher at: -45.340 vs. SHLT (-56.113). SHLT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.18M vs. CYBCF (-8.19M). SHLT has higher revenues than CYBCF: SHLT (59.4M) vs CYBCF (333K).
CYBCFSHLTCYBCF / SHLT
Capitalization39.3M99M40%
EBITDA-8.19M-5.18M158%
Gain YTD-45.340-56.11381%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue333K59.4M1%
Total Cash590KN/A-
Total Debt1.07MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYBCFSHLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CYBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EEM42.96-0.10
-0.24%
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
PIO40.33-0.20
-0.50%
Invesco Global Water ETF
SFY112.18-0.70
-0.62%
SoFi Select 500 ETF
CBSE34.39-0.46
-1.33%
Clough Select Equity ETF
DIG36.57-0.68
-1.83%
ProShares Ultra Energy

CYBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYBCF and SEEMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYBCF and SEEMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYBCF
1D Price
Change %
CYBCF100%
-6.18%
SEEMF - CYBCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HUBC - CYBCF
11%
Poorly correlated
+9.00%
SHLT - CYBCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+23.67%
AICOF - CYBCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMR - CYBCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.59%
More

SHLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHLT and PRTH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHLT and PRTH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHLT
1D Price
Change %
SHLT100%
+23.67%
PRTH - SHLT
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
NUKK - SHLT
22%
Poorly correlated
+754.68%
CXAI - SHLT
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.83%
QLYS - SHLT
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
GIGM - SHLT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More