It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYBR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYBR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INTA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CYBR (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.65% price change this week, while INTA (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +6.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.38%.
CYBR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
INTA is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
CYBR | INTA | CYBR / INTA | |
Capitalization | 11.2B | 2.5B | 447% |
EBITDA | -41.01M | -37.76M | 109% |
Gain YTD | 6.487 | -11.437 | -57% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 752M | 392M | 192% |
Total Cash | 993M | 166M | 598% |
Total Debt | 581M | 14.7M | 3,952% |
CYBR | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CYBR | INTA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago81% | 1 day ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 8 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago82% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago80% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
BRKBX | 14.78 | 0.12 | +0.82% |
MFS Blended Research Em Mkts Eq B | |||
ETCHX | 27.07 | N/A | N/A |
Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences C | |||
HWLIX | 42.06 | N/A | N/A |
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fdml Value I | |||
GIDWX | 16.84 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Premium R6 | |||
RSEBX | 65.62 | -0.23 | -0.35% |
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYBR has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CYBR jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CYBR | 100% | -1.81% | ||
PANW - CYBR | 68% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
CRWD - CYBR | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
DSGX - CYBR | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
COIN - CYBR | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.53% | ||
ADSK - CYBR | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTA has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTA jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INTA | 100% | +0.26% | ||
HUBS - INTA | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
DSGX - INTA | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
DOCN - INTA | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
EVCM - INTA | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.77% | ||
CYBR - INTA | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
More |