CYPMF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.04M
EMPPF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.01 (+4.55%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
26.39M
Ad is loading...

CYPMF vs EMPPF

Header iconCYPMF vs EMPPF Comparison
Open Charts CYPMF vs EMPPFBanner chart's image
CYPRIUM METALS
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100K
Capitalization2.04M
EMP Metals
Price$0.23
Change+$0.01 (+4.55%)
Volume$13.5K
Capitalization26.39M
CYPMF vs EMPPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CYPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYPMF vs. EMPPF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYPMF is a Hold and EMPPF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CYPMF: $0.02 vs. EMPPF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: CYPMF and EMPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYPMF: 136% vs. EMPPF: 207%
Market capitalization -- CYPMF: $2.04M vs. EMPPF: $26.39M
CYPMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.04M. EMPPF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $26.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYPMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMPPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CYPMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EMPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CYPMF and EMPPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYPMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMPPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYPMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • EMPPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMPPF is a better buy in the short-term than CYPMF.

Price Growth

CYPMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EMPPF (@Precious Metals) price change was -25.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMPPF($26.4M) has a higher market cap than CYPMF($2.05M). CYPMF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. EMPPF (-25.806). EMPPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.77M vs. CYPMF (-33.33M). CYPMF has more cash in the bank: 25.5M vs. EMPPF (156K).
CYPMFEMPPFCYPMF / EMPPF
Capitalization2.05M26.4M8%
EBITDA-33.33M-1.77M1,886%
Gain YTD0.000-25.806-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash25.5M156K16,346%
Total Debt30.3MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYPMFEMPPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
25%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CYPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DEM40.630.22
+0.54%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Div ETF
LSAF42.510.19
+0.45%
LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor® US Cr Eq ETF
HYRM23.720.03
+0.13%
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD HY Strat ETF
IMFL23.700.02
+0.10%
Invesco Intl Dev Dynmc Mltfctr ETF
BBLB82.550.07
+0.08%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. TrsBd20+YrETF

EMPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMPPF and ENDGF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMPPF and ENDGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMPPF
1D Price
Change %
EMPPF100%
+2.45%
ENDGF - EMPPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAKOF - EMPPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
CYPMF - EMPPF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRWXF - EMPPF
14%
Poorly correlated
-7.22%
ESGLF - EMPPF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More