Earnings call today
Ad is loading...
CZA vs JHG
CZA vs JHG Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs JHG
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$108.07
Change+$1.31 (+1.23%)
Volume$2.48K
Net Assets195.21M
Janus Henderson Group
Price$43.66
Change+$0.39 (+0.90%)
Volume$1.37M
Capitalization5.22B
CZA vs JHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. JHG commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a StrongBuy and JHG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JHG: Fundamental Ratings
JHG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | JHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 29 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZA | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| JHG - CZA | 71% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| ESNT - CZA | 67% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| ACT - CZA | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| ESAB - CZA | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| J - CZA | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
More | ||||
JHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JHG has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JHG jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JHG | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| APAM - JHG | 73% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| TROW - JHG | 70% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| SEIC - JHG | 69% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| BN - JHG | 68% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| KKR - JHG | 67% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
More | ||||