42 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
CZA vs JHG
CZA vs JHG Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs JHG
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$105.04
Change-$3.10 (-2.87%)
Volume$3.79K
CapitalizationN/A
Janus Henderson Group
Price$41.60
Change-$1.84 (-4.24%)
Volume$6.94K
CapitalizationN/A
CZA vs JHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. JHG commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and JHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JHG: Fundamental Ratings
JHG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | JHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZA | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| JHG - CZA | 72% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| ESNT - CZA | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| J - CZA | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| ACT - CZA | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| ESAB - CZA | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
JHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JHG has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JHG jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JHG | 100% | -1.61% | ||
| APAM - JHG | 74% Closely correlated | -3.40% | ||
| TROW - JHG | 70% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| BN - JHG | 67% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| SEIC - JHG | 66% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| IVZ - JHG | 66% Closely correlated | -1.60% | ||
More | ||||