CZFS
Price
$64.90
Change
+$2.23 (+3.56%)
Updated
Jan 31, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
231.58M
84 days until earnings call
FNLC
Price
$25.81
Change
-$0.06 (-0.23%)
Updated
Jan 31, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
274.25M
Ad is loading...

CZFS vs FNLC

Header iconCZFS vs FNLC Comparison
Open Charts CZFS vs FNLCBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Services
Price$64.90
Change+$2.23 (+3.56%)
Volume$201
Capitalization231.58M
First Ban
Price$25.81
Change-$0.06 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization274.25M
CZFS vs FNLC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNLC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZFS vs. FNLC commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZFS is a StrongBuy and FNLC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (CZFS: $62.67 vs. FNLC: $25.87)
Brand notoriety: CZFS and FNLC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZFS: 63% vs. FNLC: 76%
Market capitalization -- CZFS: $231.58M vs. FNLC: $274.25M
CZFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $231.58M. FNLC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $274.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFNLC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CZFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FNLC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the long-term than FNLC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNLC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FNLC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the short-term than FNLC.

Price Growth

CZFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.08% price change this week, while FNLC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZFS is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

FNLC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNLC($274M) has a higher market cap than CZFS($232M). CZFS has higher P/E ratio than FNLC: CZFS (11.92) vs FNLC (9.17). CZFS YTD gains are higher at: -1.011 vs. FNLC (-4.138). FNLC has less debt than CZFS: FNLC (20.1M) vs CZFS (322M). CZFS has higher revenues than FNLC: CZFS (91.9M) vs FNLC (80.6M).
CZFSFNLCCZFS / FNLC
Capitalization232M274M85%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.011-4.13824%
P/E Ratio11.929.17130%
Revenue91.9M80.6M114%
Total CashN/A25.1M-
Total Debt322M20.1M1,602%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZFS vs FNLC: Fundamental Ratings
CZFS
FNLC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1463
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5971
SMR RATING
1..100
3640
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7834
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZFS's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FNLC (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

CZFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as FNLC (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

CZFS's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FNLC (40) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

CZFS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FNLC (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

FNLC's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZFS (78) in the null industry. This means that FNLC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZFSFNLC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNLC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGUCX14.26N/A
N/A
Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infras C
GOIOX28.04N/A
N/A
JHancock International Growth 1
IGHSX12.11N/A
N/A
Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol Port S
DURIX13.09N/A
N/A
DWS ESG International Core Eq Instl
SEQFX10.98N/A
N/A
SEI Emerging Markets Equity Y (SIT)

CZFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZFS has been closely correlated with BFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZFS jumps, then BFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZFS
1D Price
Change %
CZFS100%
+3.59%
BFC - CZFS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
FRME - CZFS
67%
Closely correlated
+3.51%
FNLC - CZFS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
VBTX - CZFS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
EQBK - CZFS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
More

FNLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNLC has been closely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNLC jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLC
1D Price
Change %
FNLC100%
-0.54%
NWBI - FNLC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
CTBI - FNLC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
UBSI - FNLC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
IBOC - FNLC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
FCBC - FNLC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
More