CZFS vs HWBK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZFS is a Hold and HWBK is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CZFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHWBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CZFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HWBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CZFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CZFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CZFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +17.48% price change this week, while HWBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
CZFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
HWBK is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| CZFS | HWBK | CZFS / HWBK | |
| Capitalization | 232M | 147M | 158% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.561 | -2.061 | -124% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.92 | 149.93 | 8% |
| Revenue | 91.9M | 55.1M | 167% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 17.8M | - |
| Total Debt | 322M | 158M | 204% |
CZFS | HWBK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CZFS's Valuation (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWBK (81) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWBK’s over the last 12 months.
HWBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (56) in the null industry. This means that HWBK’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.
CZFS's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as HWBK (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to HWBK’s over the last 12 months.
CZFS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as HWBK (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to HWBK’s over the last 12 months.
HWBK's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CZFS (73) in the null industry. This means that HWBK’s stock grew significantly faster than CZFS’s over the last 12 months.
| CZFS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 28% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% |
CZFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZFS has been loosely correlated with FMNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZFS jumps, then FMNB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZFS | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| FMNB - CZFS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| UBSI - CZFS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| RBCAA - CZFS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| THFF - CZFS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| FRME - CZFS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
More | ||||
HWBK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWBK has been loosely correlated with PEBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HWBK jumps, then PEBK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HWBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWBK | 100% | N/A | ||
| PEBK - HWBK | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| FHN - HWBK | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| CZFS - HWBK | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| CHMG - HWBK | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| TSBK - HWBK | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.64% | ||
More | ||||