It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CZR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CZR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CZR (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -9.30% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.43%.
CZR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
CZR | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CZR | WANT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago79% | 7 days ago90% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago89% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SRTY | 17.62 | 0.75 | +4.45% |
ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 | |||
IUSV | 96.76 | -0.32 | -0.33% |
iShares Core S&P US Value ETF | |||
AMAX | 7.89 | -0.04 | -0.53% |
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF | |||
PSP | 68.53 | -0.38 | -0.56% |
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | |||
SUSL | 104.10 | -1.51 | -1.43% |
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZR has been closely correlated with MGM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZR jumps, then MGM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CZR | 100% | -5.00% | ||
MGM - CZR | 67% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
PENN - CZR | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
RRR - CZR | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
BYD - CZR | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
GDEN - CZR | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WANT has been closely correlated with TSLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WANT jumps, then TSLA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WANT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WANT | 100% | -2.74% | ||
TSLA - WANT | 75% Closely correlated | +3.07% | ||
AMZN - WANT | 70% Closely correlated | -4.19% | ||
HD - WANT | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
LOW - WANT | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
CZR - WANT | 59% Loosely correlated | -5.00% | ||
More |