DAR vs INGR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAR is a Hold and INGR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINGR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- DAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- INGR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DAR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INGR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DAR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- INGR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
DAR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -8.96% price change this week, while INGR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -5.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
DAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
INGR is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-3.11% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| DAR | INGR | DAR / INGR | |
| Capitalization | 7.43B | 7.69B | 97% |
| EBITDA | 1.48B | 1.17B | 126% |
| Gain YTD | -10.478 | -5.775 | 181% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.38 | 12.21 | 93% |
| Revenue | 6.79B | 8.16B | 83% |
| Total Cash | 127M | 409M | 31% |
| Total Debt | 4.64B | 2.4B | 193% |
DAR | INGR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INGR's Valuation (39) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAR (85). This means that INGR’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.
INGR's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is significantly better than the same rating for DAR (76). This means that INGR’s stock grew significantly faster than DAR’s over the last 12 months.
INGR's SMR Rating (51) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as DAR (80). This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.
INGR's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as DAR (81). This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to DAR’s over the last 12 months.
DAR's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as INGR (30). This means that DAR’s stock grew similarly to INGR’s over the last 12 months.
| DAR | INGR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 42% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 42% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 77% | 10 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 45% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LGRO | 31.44 | 3.33 | +11.83% |
| Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF | |||
| MVRL | 14.14 | 1.14 | +8.75% |
| ETRACS Mnthly Py 1.5X Lvgd Mtg REIT ETN | |||
| UJAN | 37.71 | 1.45 | +4.01% |
| Innovator US Equity Ultra Buff ETF™ Jan | |||
| NXP | 13.76 | 0.03 | +0.22% |
| Nuveen Select Tax-Free | |||
| SPTS | 29.17 | -0.09 | -0.31% |
| SPDR® Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | |||
DAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DAR and SAPIF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DAR and SAPIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAR | 100% | +9.16% | ||
| SAPIF - DAR | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.39% | ||
| LWAY - DAR | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.18% | ||
| CENTA - DAR | 29% Poorly correlated | +4.67% | ||
| CENT - DAR | 28% Poorly correlated | +5.03% | ||
| INGR - DAR | 27% Poorly correlated | +3.96% | ||
More | ||||
INGR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INGR has been loosely correlated with POST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INGR jumps, then POST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INGR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INGR | 100% | +3.96% | ||
| POST - INGR | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| FLO - INGR | 43% Loosely correlated | +3.80% | ||
| MKC - INGR | 42% Loosely correlated | +5.11% | ||
| MDLZ - INGR | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.33% | ||
| GIS - INGR | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.40% | ||
More | ||||