DB
Price
$17.91
Change
+$1.44 (+8.74%)
Updated
Apr 25, 6:59 PM EST
89 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$19.61
Change
-$0.14 (-0.71%)
Updated
Apr 25, 6:59 PM EST
84 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DB vs RF ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?

Header iconDB vs RF Comparison
Open Charts DB vs RFBanner chart's image
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
Price$17.91
Change+$1.44 (+8.74%)
Volume$2.22M
CapitalizationN/A
Regions Financial
Price$19.61
Change-$0.14 (-0.71%)
Volume$2.66M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
DB vs RF Comparison Chart

Loading...

DBDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
RFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
DB vs. RF commentary
Apr 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DB is a Buy and RF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2024
Stock price -- (DB: $17.92 vs. RF: $19.61)
Brand notoriety: DB and RF are both notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DB: 193% vs. RF: 110%
Market capitalization -- DB: $31.37B vs. RF: $18.9B
DB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $31.37B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DB’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DB’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DB is a better buy in the long-term than RF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DB is a better buy in the short-term than RF.

Price Growth

DB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +13.42% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

DB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2024.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jul 19, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.73% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for DB with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for RF with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DB($31.4B) has a higher market cap than RF($18.9B). RF has higher P/E ratio than DB: RF (9.74) vs DB (5.25). DB YTD gains are higher at: 32.251 vs. RF (2.512). RF has less debt than DB: RF (2.33B) vs DB (144B). DB has higher revenues than RF: DB (31.2B) vs RF (7.57B).
DBRFDB / RF
Capitalization31.4B18.9B166%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.2512.5121,284%
P/E Ratio5.259.7454%
Revenue31.2B7.57B412%
Total CashN/A1.55B-
Total Debt144B2.33B6,180%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DB vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
DB
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7813
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2837
SMR RATING
1..100
36
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2526
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DB's Valuation (15) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for RF (85). This means that DB’s stock grew significantly faster than RF’s over the last 12 months.

DB's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (37). This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

DB's SMR Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (6). This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

DB's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (45). This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

DB's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (26). This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DBDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
RFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNEX70.960.99
+1.41%
StoneX Group
GPS20.220.11
+0.55%
Gap (The)
SMRT2.32-0.05
-2.11%
SmartRent
NDRA0.24-0.02
-6.69%
ENDRA Life Sciences
GLYC1.71-0.14
-7.82%
GlycoMimetics

DB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DB has been loosely correlated with LYG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DB jumps, then LYG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DB
1D Price
Change %
DB100%
+8.74%
LYG - DB
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
UMBF - DB
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
TFC - DB
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
FITB - DB
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
FNB - DB
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
-0.81%
HBAN - RF
89%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
FITB - RF
86%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
CMA - RF
85%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
MTB - RF
84%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
KEY - RF
83%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
More