DBCCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
GBHPF
Price
$0.02
Change
+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

DBCCF vs GBHPF

Header iconDBCCF vs GBHPF Comparison
Open Charts DBCCF vs GBHPFBanner chart's image
Decibel Cannabis
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$319.23K
CapitalizationN/A
Global Hemp Group
Price$0.02
Change+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Volume$1.61K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
DBCCF vs GBHPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
DBCCF vs. GBHPF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBCCF is a Hold and GBHPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (DBCCF: $0.04 vs. GBHPF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: DBCCF and GBHPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DBCCF: 145% vs. GBHPF: 8%
Market capitalization -- DBCCF: $42.97M vs. GBHPF: $1.35M
DBCCF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $42.97M. GBHPF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $1.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DBCCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGBHPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DBCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GBHPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBCCF is a better buy in the long-term than GBHPF.

Price Growth

DBCCF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -8.66% price change this week, while GBHPF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +36.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +8.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+8.21% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBCCF($43M) has a higher market cap than GBHPF($1.35M). GBHPF YTD gains are higher at: 17.647 vs. DBCCF (-62.487). DBCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.05M vs. GBHPF (-1.65M). DBCCF has more cash in the bank: 3.87M vs. GBHPF (3.86K). GBHPF has less debt than DBCCF: GBHPF (507K) vs DBCCF (49.3M). DBCCF has higher revenues than GBHPF: DBCCF (89.8M) vs GBHPF (0).
DBCCFGBHPFDBCCF / GBHPF
Capitalization43M1.35M3,183%
EBITDA6.05M-1.65M-367%
Gain YTD-62.48717.647-354%
P/E Ratio37.45N/A-
Revenue89.8M0-
Total Cash3.87M3.86K100,285%
Total Debt49.3M507K9,724%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBHPF: Fundamental Ratings
GBHPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
40
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

DBCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBCCF and ESALF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBCCF and ESALF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBCCF
1D Price
Change %
DBCCF100%
-0.81%
ESALF - DBCCF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBHPF - DBCCF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELTP - DBCCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
CXXIF - DBCCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.20%
FFNTF - DBCCF
1%
Poorly correlated
-21.49%
More

GBHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBHPF and CXXIF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBHPF and CXXIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBHPF
1D Price
Change %
GBHPF100%
N/A
CXXIF - GBHPF
14%
Poorly correlated
-5.20%
DBCCF - GBHPF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
ELTP - GBHPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
FFNTF - GBHPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-21.49%
ETST - GBHPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
More