Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBLSX vs LALDX
DBLSX vs LALDX Comparison
Open Charts DBLSX vs LALDX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond I
Price$9.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income A
Price$3.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.31B
DBLSX vs LALDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBLSX vs. LALDX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBLSX is a Hold and LALDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LALDX has more cash in the bank: 42.3B vs. DBLSX (6.22B). LALDX (5.01) and DBLSX (4.97) have matching dividends . DBLSX was incepted earlier than LALDX: DBLSX (14 years) vs LALDX (32 years). LALDX (0.58) is less costly to investors than DBLSX (0.44). LALDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. DBLSX (76.00). LALDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBLSX: LALDX (1500) vs DBLSX (100000). LALDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. DBLSX (5.30). DBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.71 vs. LALDX (12.39).
| DBLSX | LALDX | DBLSX / LALDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.58 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.58 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.467 | 2.124 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1500 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 42.3B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.97 | 5.01 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.30 | 5.69 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.82 | 13.50 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.71 | 12.39 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.84 | 26.64 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement