Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBLSX vs LALDX
DBLSX vs LALDX Comparison
Open Charts DBLSX vs LALDX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond I
Price$9.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.23B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income A
Price$3.88
Change-$0.01 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.77B
DBLSX vs LALDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBLSX vs. LALDX commentary
Aug 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBLSX is a Hold and LALDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LALDX has more cash in the bank: 42.8B vs. DBLSX (6.23B). LALDX (5.05) and DBLSX (4.87) have matching dividends . DBLSX was incepted earlier than LALDX: DBLSX (14 years) vs LALDX (32 years). LALDX (0.58) is less costly to investors than DBLSX (0.45). DBLSX (93.00) and LALDX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. LALDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBLSX: LALDX (1500) vs DBLSX (100000). LALDX (5.17) and DBLSX (4.98) have marching annual gain over last year. DBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.86 vs. LALDX (12.86).
| DBLSX | LALDX | DBLSX / LALDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.58 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.58 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.829 | 3.547 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1500 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.23B | 42.8B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.87 | 5.05 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.98 | 5.17 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.56 | 14.21 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.86 | 12.86 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.55 | 28.75 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement