DC
Price
$3.77
Change
-$0.07 (-1.82%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
205.57M
68 days until earnings call
ESGLF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
25.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DC vs ESGLF

Header iconDC vs ESGLF Comparison
Open Charts DC vs ESGLFBanner chart's image
Dakota Gold
Price$3.77
Change-$0.07 (-1.82%)
Volume$3.01K
Capitalization205.57M
EnviroGold Global
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization25.07M
DC vs ESGLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DC vs. ESGLF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DC is a Hold and ESGLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (DC: $3.84 vs. ESGLF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: DC and ESGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DC: 99% vs. ESGLF: 44%
Market capitalization -- DC: $205.57M vs. ESGLF: $25.07M
DC [@Precious Metals] is valued at $205.57M. ESGLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $25.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESGLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ESGLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESGLF is a better buy in the long-term than DC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

DC (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.03% price change this week, while ESGLF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

DC is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.00% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DC($206M) has a higher market cap than ESGLF($25.1M). DC has higher P/E ratio than ESGLF: DC (41.32) vs ESGLF (2.37). ESGLF YTD gains are higher at: 100.145 vs. DC (74.545). ESGLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.72M vs. DC (-37.73M). DC has more cash in the bank: 25.5M vs. ESGLF (1.43M). DC has less debt than ESGLF: DC (230K) vs ESGLF (1.48M). DC (0) and ESGLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DCESGLFDC / ESGLF
Capitalization206M25.1M821%
EBITDA-37.73M-4.72M799%
Gain YTD74.545100.14574%
P/E Ratio41.322.371,747%
Revenue00-
Total Cash25.5M1.43M1,779%
Total Debt230K1.48M16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESGLF: Fundamental Ratings
ESGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMLCX36.87N/A
N/A
SEI Tax-Managed Large Cap F (SIMT)
VIMSX75.28N/A
N/A
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
QCERX19.97N/A
N/A
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style R6
FAMDX25.81N/A
N/A
FAM Small Cap Institutional
HCMAX28.17N/A
N/A
Hillman Value

ESGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESGLF and CCHI have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESGLF and CCHI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESGLF
1D Price
Change %
ESGLF100%
+7.24%
CCHI - ESGLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HWAUF - ESGLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
GRYCF - ESGLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRX - ESGLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
DC - ESGLF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
More