Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCIX vs NAESX
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$29.93
Change+$0.33 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.18B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.70
Change+$1.38 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. DCCIX (7.18B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: NAESX (1.28) vs DCCIX (0.62). DCCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCCIX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCCIX (0.81) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). DCCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.35 vs. DCCIX (-2.24). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.03 vs. DCCIX (40.40).
| DCCIX | NAESX | DCCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.600 | 0.302 | -862% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.18B | 153B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.28 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.24 | 4.35 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.53 | 35.91 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.40 | 63.03 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.35 | 104.94 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement