Ad is loading...
DCIBX vs MKCMX
DCIBX vs MKCMX Comparison
Open Charts DCIBX vs MKCMX
DFA CA Intermediate-Term Muni Bd I
Price$10.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets433.77M
BlackRock California Munl Opps Inv K
Price$11.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.3B
DCIBX vs MKCMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCIBX vs. MKCMX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCIBX is a Hold and MKCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKCMX has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. DCIBX (434M). MKCMX pays higher dividends than DCIBX: MKCMX (3.59) vs DCIBX (2.18). DCIBX was incepted earlier than MKCMX: DCIBX (13 years) vs MKCMX (7 years). MKCMX (0.50) is less costly to investors than DCIBX (0.21). MKCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. DCIBX (46.00). DCIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCMX: DCIBX (0) vs MKCMX (5000000). MKCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.53 vs. DCIBX (1.88). MKCMX return over 5 years is better than : 13.48 vs. DCIBX (1.39).
| DCIBX | MKCMX | DCIBX / MKCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.21 | 0.49 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.21 | 0.50 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.381 | -0.808 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 434M | 2.31B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.18 | 3.59 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.88 | 2.53 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.49 | 8.49 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.39 | 13.48 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.03 | N/A | - |