DDEJF
Price
$1.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
DGDCF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

DDEJF vs DGDCF

Header iconDDEJF vs DGDCF Comparison
Open Charts DDEJF vs DGDCFBanner chart's image
Dundee
Price$1.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$19.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Dynasty Gold
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$5.8K
CapitalizationN/A
DDEJF vs DGDCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DDEJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DDEJF vs. DGDCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDEJF is a Hold and DGDCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (DDEJF: $1.04 vs. DGDCF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: DDEJF and DGDCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DDEJF: 118% vs. DGDCF: 44%
Market capitalization -- DDEJF: $85.39M vs. DGDCF: $15.2M
DDEJF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $85.39M. DGDCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DDEJF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDGDCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DDEJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DGDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DDEJF is a better buy in the long-term than DGDCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DDEJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DGDCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DDEJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DGDCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DGDCF is a better buy in the short-term than DDEJF.

Price Growth

DDEJF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.57% price change this week, while DGDCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +13.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DDEJF($85.4M) has a higher market cap than DGDCF($15.2M). DDEJF YTD gains are higher at: 49.168 vs. DGDCF (-31.357). DGDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -326.02K vs. DDEJF (-18.48M). DDEJF has more cash in the bank: 158M vs. DGDCF (955K). DDEJF has higher revenues than DGDCF: DDEJF (7.19M) vs DGDCF (0).
DDEJFDGDCFDDEJF / DGDCF
Capitalization85.4M15.2M562%
EBITDA-18.48M-326.02K5,669%
Gain YTD49.168-31.357-157%
P/E Ratio4.43N/A-
Revenue7.19M0-
Total Cash158M955K16,545%
Total Debt8.64MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DDEJF vs DGDCF: Fundamental Ratings
DDEJF
DGDCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8123
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6677
SMR RATING
1..100
4091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4590
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DGDCF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as DDEJF (62). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to DDEJF’s over the last 12 months.

DDEJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (77). This means that DDEJF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

DDEJF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DGDCF (91). This means that DDEJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

DDEJF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DGDCF (90). This means that DDEJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

DDEJF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (100). This means that DDEJF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DDEJFDGDCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DDEJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HKD2.790.04
+1.45%
AMTD Digital
HOTH0.820.01
+1.22%
Hoth Therapeutics
NMIH37.69-0.39
-1.02%
NMI Holdings
TROO1.90-0.02
-1.04%
TROOPS
RNR255.19-5.05
-1.94%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd

DDEJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DDEJF and HWAUF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDEJF and HWAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDEJF
1D Price
Change %
DDEJF100%
-6.60%
HWAUF - DDEJF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAPTF - DDEJF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
RGCCF - DDEJF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMLRF - DDEJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DGDCF - DDEJF
8%
Poorly correlated
+28.13%
More

DGDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DGDCF and GSHRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DGDCF and GSHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DGDCF
1D Price
Change %
DGDCF100%
+28.13%
GSHRF - DGDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
AEM - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
GOLD - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
AGI - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
ABNAF - DGDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More