Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDFLX vs FFRHX
DDFLX vs FFRHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDFLX vs. FFRHX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDFLX is a Buy and FFRHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. DDFLX (734M). DDFLX (7.91) and FFRHX (7.87) have matching dividends . DDFLX was incepted earlier than FFRHX: DDFLX (15 years) vs FFRHX (23 years). FFRHX (0.73) is less costly to investors than DDFLX (0.69). DDFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). DDFLX (0) and FFRHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DDFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. FFRHX (7.23). FFRHX (40.93) and DDFLX (40.66) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DDFLX | FFRHX | DDFLX / FFRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.73 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.73 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.024 | 2.590 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 734M | 15.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.91 | 7.87 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.82 | 7.23 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.33 | 30.13 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.66 | 40.93 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.01 | 60.71 | 97% |