Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDFLX vs TRIZX
DDFLX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.25B vs. DDFLX (742M). TRIZX (8.33) and DDFLX (8.03) have matching dividends . DDFLX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: DDFLX (15 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). DDFLX (0.69) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.62). DDFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. TRIZX (77.90). DDFLX (0) and TRIZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. DDFLX (7.51). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 42.92 vs. DDFLX (39.58).
| DDFLX | TRIZX | DDFLX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.02 | 3,450% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.709 | 2.522 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 742M | 4.25B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.03 | 8.33 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.51 | 8.22 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.96 | 32.31 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.58 | 42.92 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement