Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDLS vs FYLD
DDLS vs FYLD Comparison
Open Charts DDLS vs FYLD
WisdomTree Dynamic Intl SmCap Eq ETF
Price$39.57
Change+$0.54 (+1.38%)
Volume$80.72K
Net Assets429.21M
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
Price$29.18
Change+$0.17 (+0.59%)
Volume$30.11K
Net Assets409.82M
DDLS vs FYLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDLS vs. FYLD commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDLS is a Buy and FYLD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DDLS (429M) and FYLD (410M) have similar net assets . FYLD has a higher annual dividend yield than DDLS: FYLD (17.719) vs DDLS (15.712). DDLS was incepted earlier than FYLD: DDLS (9 years) vs FYLD (12 years). DDLS (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than FYLD (0.59). FYLD has a higher turnover DDLS (37.00) vs DDLS (37.00).
| DDLS | FYLD | DDLS / FYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 15.712 | 17.719 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 429M | 410M | 105% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.59 | 81% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 44.00 | 84% |
| Yield | 3.43 | 4.11 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DDLS | FYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 73% | 5 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DDLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDLS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDLS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDLS | 100% | +2.46% | ||
| MT - DDLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| VNT - DDLS | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| DOV - DDLS | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| GEN - DDLS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| KEYS - DDLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||
FYLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYLD | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| BHP - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| WDS - FYLD | 70% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| SHEL - FYLD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| CVE - FYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| MT - FYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
More | ||||