Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDLS vs FYLD
DDLS vs FYLD Comparison
Open Charts DDLS vs FYLD
WisdomTree Dynamic Intl SmCap Eq ETF
Price$39.02
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
Volume$30.79K
Net Assets429.44M
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
Price$28.86
Change+$0.21 (+0.73%)
Volume$20.94K
Net Assets382.07M
DDLS vs FYLD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDLS vs. FYLD commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDLS is a Hold and FYLD is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DDLS has more net assets: 429M vs. FYLD (382M). FYLD has a higher annual dividend yield than DDLS: FYLD (14.561) vs DDLS (11.934). DDLS was incepted earlier than FYLD: DDLS (9 years) vs FYLD (12 years). DDLS (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than FYLD (0.59). FYLD has a higher turnover DDLS (37.00) vs DDLS (37.00).
| DDLS | FYLD | DDLS / FYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 11.934 | 14.561 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 429M | 382M | 112% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.59 | 81% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 44.00 | 84% |
| Yield | 3.43 | 4.11 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DDLS | FYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 12 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DDLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDLS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDLS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDLS | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| MT - DDLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| VNT - DDLS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| DOW - DDLS | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| DOV - DDLS | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| GEN - DDLS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||
FYLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYLD | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| WDS - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| BHP - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| SHEL - FYLD | 69% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| CVE - FYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.42% | ||
| MT - FYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||