Advertisement
DDOG vs FFLS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDOG is a Hold and FFLS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DDOG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- DDOG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DDOG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- DDOG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DDOG (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.40% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
DDOG is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.68% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| DDOG | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 12 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 26 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
DDOG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDOG has been loosely correlated with DT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDOG jumps, then DT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDOG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDOG | 100% | -1.82% | ||
| DT - DDOG | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| NOW - DDOG | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| COIN - DDOG | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| ZS - DDOG | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| CRM - DDOG | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 68% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| META - FFLS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| DDOG - FFLS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| ASML - FFLS | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.21% | ||
More | ||||