Ad is loading...
DEMCX vs FNWFX
DEMCX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs FNWFX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$19.88
Change+$0.14 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.42B
American Funds New World F3
Price$81.74
Change+$0.22 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
DEMCX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. FNWFX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a StrongBuy and FNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. DEMCX (5.42B). FNWFX pays higher dividends than DEMCX: FNWFX (1.21) vs DEMCX (1.06). DEMCX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: DEMCX (29 years) vs FNWFX (8 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). DEMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: DEMCX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.79 vs. DEMCX (2.75). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.68 vs. DEMCX (31.93).
| DEMCX | FNWFX | DEMCX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.57 | 381% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.57 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.882 | 6.128 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.42B | 63.8B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.21 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.75 | 3.79 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.63 | 26.93 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.93 | 38.68 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers