DEMZ vs KLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMZ is a Hold and KLAC is a Hold.
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DEMZ | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 28 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FSYKX | 9.27 | 0.01 | +0.11% |
| Fidelity Advisor Sustainable EM Eq C | |||
| TBLIX | 34.69 | -0.31 | -0.89% |
| Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced I | |||
| IVIPX | 41.80 | -0.49 | -1.16% |
| VY® Invesco Equity and Income S2 | |||
| DFMIX | 35.06 | -0.56 | -1.57% |
| Davidson Multi-Cap Equity I | |||
| PWJZX | 33.08 | -0.59 | -1.75% |
| PGIM Jennison International Opps Z | |||
DEMZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEMZ has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DEMZ jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEMZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEMZ | 100% | -1.48% | ||
| CDNS - DEMZ | 74% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| SNPS - DEMZ | 72% Closely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| KLAC - DEMZ | 72% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| LRCX - DEMZ | 72% Closely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| MSFT - DEMZ | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | -3.00% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 92% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 91% Closely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 87% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| VECO - KLAC | 83% Closely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| ONTO - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | -4.60% | ||
More | ||||